Articles database
 
 
Web AnyArticles.com
Browse by Category:
  Business >
  Subcategories
Advertising Advertising (536)
Branding Branding (350)
Careers Employment Careers Employment (1821)
Customer Service Customer Service (537)
Entrepreneurialism Entrepreneurialism (688)
Ethics Ethics (91)
Management Management (1711)
Marketing Marketing (1932)
Negotiation Negotiation (134)
Networking Networking (316)
PR PR (642)
Presentation Presentation (230)
Sales Sales (673)
Sales Management Sales Management (216)
Sales Teleselling Sales Teleselling (98)
Sales Training Sales Training (535)
Small Business Small Business (1284)
Strategic Planning Strategic Planning (367)
Team Building Team Building (236)
Top7 or 10 Tips Top7 or 10 Tips (256)


  Categories :
 
  Arts and Entertainment
  Automotive
  Business
  Communications
  Computers and Technology
  Finance
  Food and Drink
  Health and Fitness
  Home and Family
  Home Based Business
  Internet and Businesses Online
  Kids and Teens
  Legal
  News and Society
  Recreation and Sports
  Reference and Education
  Self Improvement
  Shopping and Product Reviews
  Travel and Leisure
  Womens Interests
  Writing and Speaking
  Random Category
  University
  Funny stuff
  Funny stuff
Ethics article : Respecting Employee Privacy Rights in the Workplace When Using Video Surveillance
 

Business > Ethics > Respecting Employee Privacy Rights in the Workplace When Using Video Surveillance

0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Alice Osborn

The loss of employee privacy rights in the workplace is a growing concern among employees, attorneys, and civil libertarian groups. Although employers in banks, telecommunications, securities exchange, in hi-tech industries, and in other workplaces justify using video surveillance in the workplace to monitor employee behavior to chiefly promote safety, improve productivity, and stop theft, protecting employee privacy must be a top concern. For if the courts find that the employer’s surveillance methods are less than fair, that firm may find itself knee-deep in lawsuits that could have been prevented.

Employers install hidden surveillance cameras for many good reasons (preventing theft, promoting productivity or protecting employees) that in some cases will intrude upon employee privacy. Legal observers and human resource specialists who study workplace privacy believe that employee privacy intrusions are more common than previously observed, and that they will increase every year.

According to a 2005 survey conducted by the American Management Association, more than half of the companies surveyed use video monitoring to prevent theft, violence and sabotage (51% in 2005 vs. 33% in 2001). In addition, the number of companies that use video surveillance to track employees’ performance has also increased, with 10% now videotaping selected job functions and 6% videotaping all employees. Among firms that use video surveillance, 85% notify employees.

As more and more employee groups become aware of how they are being watched, the more likely they will take their employers to court.

These are the four main types of court-upheld privacy violations that could occur in stores, factories and offices and the first type is directly related to video surveillance.

• Intrusion upon seclusion which includes invading worker privacy in bathrooms and changing rooms

• Publication of private employee matters

• Disclosure of medical records

• Appropriation of an employee’s likeness for commercial purposes

In addition, video surveillance must be limited to visual images and cannot include audio in order to comply with federal and state statutes.

Employers need to be proactive and aware of these four privacy violations so that their employees’ individual rights are respected and protected.

How to achieve balance between monitoring and intruding upon employees

First, the employers need to clarify what privacy rights employees are guaranteed and what constitutes an invasion of privacy. Then, employees must be notified in writing that surveillance will be conducted and they should also sign a waiver verifying that they know they may be monitored.

Management must define what is acceptable supervision versus "snoopervision" and that includes not videotaping showers, restrooms, changing rooms, smoking areas, and employee lounges. These are places specifically for employees' personal comfort, health or for safeguarding their possessions. However, employers must also be sensitive against using video surveillance in other areas where employees might takes breaks.

Employers must be fully aware of the privacy risks associated with videotaping employees so that the likelihood of litigation is reduced. Companies should also nurture a workplace environment where employees can voice privacy or security concerns in confidence with management without feeling that their conversations are being monitored. In short, if employers choose to use video surveillance in the workplace, they must adhere to written privacy guidelines that will keep employees secure and that will also respect their privacy.

Copyright © 2005 Evaluseek Publishing.

About the Author
Alice Osborn is a successful freelance writer providing practical information and advice about video surveillance and related topics. Her numerous articles include tips for saving both time and money when shopping for video security products; equipment reviews and reports; and other valuable insights. Learn more about wireless home security systems or video security systems for business when you visit Video-Surveillance-Guide.com today!


0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Alice Osborn
Rate this story : and read/post review(s)


Article reviews



Post your review
[ Note : no HTML/URLs - will removed automatically ]
Your name
Your comments


More articles from Business > Ethics

Add article | Manage Articles | Top Rated articles | Most Reviewed articles | Contact us | Links