Articles database
 
 
Web AnyArticles.com
Browse by Category:
  Finance >
  Subcategories
Credit Credit (1076)
Currency Trading Currency Trading (330)
Debt Consolidation Debt Consolidation (371)
Debt Relief Debt Relief (345)
Insurance Insurance (884)
Investing Investing (695)
Leases Leasing Leases Leasing (47)
Loans Loans (1388)
Mortgage Refinance Mortgage Refinance (1312)
Personal Finance Personal Finance (436)
Real Estate Real Estate (2223)
Stocks Mutual Funds Stocks Mutual Funds (573)
Structured Settlements Structured Settlements (42)
Taxes Taxes (239)
Wealth Building Wealth Building (318)


  Categories :
 
  Arts and Entertainment
  Automotive
  Business
  Communications
  Computers and Technology
  Finance
  Food and Drink
  Health and Fitness
  Home and Family
  Home Based Business
  Internet and Businesses Online
  Kids and Teens
  Legal
  News and Society
  Recreation and Sports
  Reference and Education
  Self Improvement
  Shopping and Product Reviews
  Travel and Leisure
  Womens Interests
  Writing and Speaking
  Random Category
  Fishing
  Traffic Building
  Branding
Investing article : Mutual Fund Returns May Not Be As They Seem!
 

Finance > Investing > Mutual Fund Returns May Not Be As They Seem!

0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Dr. Scott Brown, Ph.D.

Arthur Levitt, during his tenure at the SEC, experienced many cases where the non-indexed mutual fund manager bought shares for their own accounts before the fund bought the shares. The fund’s purchases drove up the price of the stocks and the fund manager’s made a killing on the deal. This is called “front running,” and is illegal under securities laws.

Mr. Levitt also witnessed instances where the funds would buy huge blocks to run up the stock price at the end of the financial reporting period. This made the fund look like it had a high profit when it did not. This makes the fund’s performance look better than it really is.

The SEC brought enforcement cases against some of the largest and most respected companies during Mr. Levitt’s tenure as SEC chairman. A mutual fund run by Van Kampen Investment Corp. for example, claimed in public advertisements that it had returned 62 percent in 1996. This information caused the fund-rating service Lipper Inc to report the mutual fund as the top performer in its class, a full 20% ahead of the second-best performing fund in the category.

But investors weren’t told that the excellent returns of the Van Kampen fund were on tiny assets of $200,000.00 to $380,000.00. This is because it was really a so-called incubator fund operating on seed money until its portfolio manager could establish a track record for marketing purposes. Nor were investors told that more than half the returns came from investments in thirty-one hot IPOs. An IPO is an “Initial Public Offering” that occurs when a firm first offers its stock across a public exchange. Since the stock is new nobody knows how it will perform except insiders.

The fund only had to buy between 100 and 400 shares of each IPO to achieve a huge amplification of the returns. The 62% return unrealistically raised investor expectations and was unsustainable. When senior managers of Van Kampen decided to sell the fund to the public some 15,000 people invested $100,000,000.00 within six weeks. Van Kampen settled SEC charges that it had misled investors. What a bunch of con artists. The modern day mutual fund is like a remake of the movie “The

Sting” where Paul Newman’s character has been replaced by the fund manager!

A fund run by Dreyfus Corp., owned by Mellon Financial Corp., paid almost $3 million to settle, without admitting or denying guilt, similar charges of fraudulently luring investors with unsustainable returns. Its manager claimed returns of more than 80%, but failed to tell investors that the fund had received a disproportionate number of IPO shares that should have been allocated to other Dreyfus funds.

The fund industry should work less on image creation and more on making sure that it has done everything it can to safeguard investor’s money and boost returns. The mutual fund industry has become a financial powerhouse over the past twenty years and only cares about how much money it can suck out of the public just as it was at the turn of the last century when they were called investment pools. Funds are glitzy marketing operations instead of stewards of other people’s money. Don’t put your trust in them unless they are fully indexed like the Vanguard 500 (VFINX).

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dr. Scott Brown, Ph.D., a.k.a. “The Wallet Doctor”, is a successful futures trader, real estate investor, and stock investor. Dr. Brown holds a Ph.D. in finance from the University of South Carolina. His 1998 articles in Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities were prophetic in predicting an impending stock market crash. He has helped many people become profitable investors by teaching them to look out over many years to spot stocks that are low and primed for rise in the new bull market. His second article met with approval by Dr. Bob Shiller of Yale University. Dr. Shiller is the economist that Alan Greenspan most highly regards who coined the term “Irrational Exuberance.” In 1998 he shouted to the world to “get out” of the stock market but now he is shouting to everyone that it is time to “get in!” The Wallet Doctor is not only sought after for investment advice and coaching in stock investing but also in futures trading and real estate investing. Visit Dr. Brown’s site at http://www.BonanzaBase.com or sign up for his investment tips at http://www.WalletDoctor.com


Deep Articles portal.



0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Dr. Scott Brown, Ph.D.
Rate this story : and read/post review(s)


Article reviews



Post your review
[ Note : no HTML/URLs - will removed automatically ]
Your name
Your comments


More articles from Finance > Investing

Add article | Manage Articles | Top Rated articles | Most Reviewed articles | Contact us | Links