Articles database
 
 
Web AnyArticles.com
Browse by Category:
 
  Subcategories
Acne Acne (413)
Aerobics Cardio Aerobics Cardio (70)
Alternative Alternative (1277)
Beauty Beauty (1127)
Build Muscle Build Muscle (396)
Depression Depression (383)
Diabetes Diabetes (188)
Exercise Exercise (565)
Fitness Equipment Fitness Equipment (386)
Hair Loss Hair Loss (305)
Medicine Medicine (640)
Meditation Meditation (151)
Men Issues Men Issues (315)
Nutrition Nutrition (1092)
Supplements Supplements (645)
Weight Loss Weight Loss (2187)
Women Issues Women Issues (481)
Yoga Yoga (209)


  Categories :
 
  Arts and Entertainment
  Automotive
  Business
  Communications
  Computers and Technology
  Finance
  Food and Drink
  Health and Fitness
  Home and Family
  Home Based Business
  Internet and Businesses Online
  Kids and Teens
  Legal
  News and Society
  Recreation and Sports
  Reference and Education
  Self Improvement
  Shopping and Product Reviews
  Travel and Leisure
  Womens Interests
  Writing and Speaking
  Random Category
  Funny stuff
  Funny stuff
  Pregnancy
Health and Fitness article : Hospital Peer Review
 

Health and Fitness > Hospital Peer Review

0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Skip Freedman

In September, 2005, AllMed conducted research about the issues surrounding external hospital peer review. The purpose of this survey was to determine the problems which hospitals and medical groups are looking to solve when sending out cases for external review. The findings were quite interesting, as follows:

· All of the survey respondents said they had sent a peer review out during the past six months.

· Fifty percent of the respondents sent out one to five peer reviews, while 35 percent sent out more than five. Of these, eight percent sent out more than 20 in the past six months.

The reasons respondents gave for sending out peer reviews included the following:

· Eliminating conflicts of interest (93%)
· Gaining access to specialist expertise (63%)
· Improving quality or risk management (59%)
· Improving patient safety (52%)
· Preventing litigation (22%)
· Meeting regulatory requirements (15%)
· Overcoming staffing shortages (4%)

According to one respondent, their hospital relies on external reviews because it is unable to perform internal reviews due to conflict of interests and limited subspecialty expertise. The respondents from smaller community hospitals commented that they lacked an adequate number of peers to conduct an internal review, especially in sensitive situations. What was more interesting is that 78 percent of the respondents said they would proactively consider sending out peer reviews to an external reviewer in the future.

It’s clear from these results that independent review organizations like AllMed are playing an increasing role in helping hospitals improve the quality of care and, at the same time, reduce the risks associated with the review process. For information about AllMed’s hospital peer review services, please visit our website, or download our free hospital peer review white paper.

About AllMed Healthcare Management Founded in 1995, AllMed (http://www.allmedmd.com, http://www.allmedmd.com/blog/index.htm) is a URAC-accredited Independent Review Organization (IRO) serving insurance payers, providers, TPAs and claims managers nationwide. Reviews are conducted by board-certified physicians in active practice. AllMed's growing customer base includes premier organizations, such as Educator's Mutual Life, IMS Managed Care, Tenet Healthcare Corporation, HealthGuard, several Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations, TriWest Healthcare Alliance, Allianz and many other leading healthcare payers.


0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Skip Freedman
Rate this story : and read/post review(s)


Article reviews



Post your review
[ Note : no HTML/URLs - will removed automatically ]
Your name
Your comments


More articles from Health and Fitness

Add article | Manage Articles | Top Rated articles | Most Reviewed articles | Contact us | Links