Articles database
 
 
Web AnyArticles.com
Browse by Category:
  Health and Fitness >
  Subcategories
Acne Acne (413)
Aerobics Cardio Aerobics Cardio (70)
Alternative Alternative (1277)
Beauty Beauty (1127)
Build Muscle Build Muscle (396)
Depression Depression (383)
Diabetes Diabetes (188)
Exercise Exercise (565)
Fitness Equipment Fitness Equipment (386)
Hair Loss Hair Loss (305)
Medicine Medicine (640)
Meditation Meditation (151)
Men Issues Men Issues (315)
Nutrition Nutrition (1092)
Supplements Supplements (645)
Weight Loss Weight Loss (2187)
Women Issues Women Issues (481)
Yoga Yoga (209)


  Categories :
 
  Arts and Entertainment
  Automotive
  Business
  Communications
  Computers and Technology
  Finance
  Food and Drink
  Health and Fitness
  Home and Family
  Home Based Business
  Internet and Businesses Online
  Kids and Teens
  Legal
  News and Society
  Recreation and Sports
  Reference and Education
  Self Improvement
  Shopping and Product Reviews
  Travel and Leisure
  Womens Interests
  Writing and Speaking
  Random Category
  Travel tips
  Wedding
  Hardware
Medicine article : IROs and the Hospital Peer Review Process
 

Health and Fitness > Medicine > IROs and the Hospital Peer Review Process

0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Skip Freedman

Many hospital CEOs, medical directors and risk managers are hesitant to consider outsourcing peer reviews, because they simply have never done so in the past. They have concerns about invasive scrutiny by external organizations, potential loss of control, the possible polarizing effect on their staff and a fear that the focus will be on finding and punishing “bad” doctors.

Because of inherent conflicts of interest that exist in hospitals’ peer review process, hospital quality management systems need to ensure objectivity and adherence to accepted medical protocols.

For this reason, many hospital groups are proactively moving toward Independent Review Organizations for unbiased peer reviews. Not only are they seeing this as a best practice, but they also gain other benefits, including rapid resolution of sensitive cases, heading off high-profile lawsuits, reducing internal polarization and preventing damage to physician’s careers.

Done correctly, peer review takes a systematic approach to determining the reasons for sentinel events that have undesirable outcomes. The focus is not on “good doctor or bad doctor” issues, but on a broader range of questions such as:

Was there adequate support? Were the protocols and processes defined? Do we have the right physician expertise and training to consistently produce positive patient outcomes? Do we need better trained assistance? The true goal of the peer review process is not to point fingers or punish people, but to improve patient safety by identifying quality management issues and fixing them.

Download our free white paper Best Practices in Hospital Peer Review.

About AllMed Healthcare Management Founded in 1995, AllMed (http://www.allmedmd.com, http://www.allmedmd.com/blog/index.htm) is a URAC-accredited Independent Review Organization (IRO) serving insurance payers, providers, TPAs and claims managers nationwide. Reviews are conducted by board-certified physicians in active practice. AllMed's growing customer base includes premier organizations, such as Educator's Mutual Life, IMS Managed Care, Tenet Healthcare Corporation, HealthGuard, several Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations, TriWest Healthcare Alliance, Allianz and many other leading healthcare payers.


0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Skip Freedman
Rate this story : and read/post review(s)


Article reviews



Post your review
[ Note : no HTML/URLs - will removed automatically ]
Your name
Your comments


More articles from Health and Fitness > Medicine

Add article | Manage Articles | Top Rated articles | Most Reviewed articles | Contact us | Links