Articles database
 
 
Web AnyArticles.com
Browse by Category:
 
  Subcategories


  Categories :
 
  Arts and Entertainment
  Automotive
  Business
  Communications
  Computers and Technology
  Finance
  Food and Drink
  Health and Fitness
  Home and Family
  Home Based Business
  Internet and Businesses Online
  Kids and Teens
  Legal
  News and Society
  Recreation and Sports
  Reference and Education
  Self Improvement
  Shopping and Product Reviews
  Travel and Leisure
  Womens Interests
  Writing and Speaking
  Random Category
  Stress Management
  Spirituality
  Funny stuff
Legal article : Information Technology - Wrongful Termination of Contract
 

Legal > Information Technology - Wrongful Termination of Contract

0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Rosanna Cooper

In the recent case, Peregrine Systems Limited v Steria Limited [2005] , a customer wrongly terminated an IT contract with its software supplier and as a result had to pay the supplier £700,000 plus interests - the outstanding balance due to the supplier under the contract.

The defendant, Steria, terminated the agreement with Peregrine Systems alleging that it was entitled to terminate the contract between the parties as a result of delays and commercial misstatements. Steria also claimed damages from Peregrine.

In return, Peregrine brought proceedings against Steria for money owed under the contract. Initially, the Court held that Peregrine had not committed any breach of contract and that there had been no misstatements. The Court also held that Steria had in any event lost the right to terminate the contract because Steria had, by its conduct, affirmed the contract by continuing to use the software. Steria appealed these decisions.

The Court of Appeal decided against Steria on both as follows:

Due to the wording of the contract Peregrine was only obliged to provide £200,000 worth of services and was not required to fully implement the software. Once Peregrine had provided £200,000 worth of services, there was no obligation to do anything more to complete the project within a reasonable time;

A supplier having to

perform “within a reasonable time” does not necessarily mean that the customer can end the contract if this is not done;

Steria had not properly communicated its dissatisfaction to Peregrine; and Steria continued to use the software and so acted in a manner implying Steria's wish to affirm the contract.

Comment: This case highlights the importance of contractual parties clearly setting out their rights and responsibilities when entering into an IT contract. Furthermore, parties should act properly when dissatisfied with goods or services and analyse contractual documentation carefully before deciding to terminate an IT contract.

If you require further information contact us at enquiries@rtcoopers.com

© RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances

Intellectual property/IT law firm advising on patents, Patent attorneys, Patent Lawyers, Copyright, IT Contracts, trade marks, trademarks, copyright law, IP lawyers, IP law Firm, IP valuations IP solicitors freedom to operate copyright lawyers, patent solicitors, branding,intellectual property lawyers, intellectual property solicitors. If you require further information contact us at enquiries@rtcoopers.com or visit our website at http://www.rtcoopers.com



0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Rosanna Cooper
Rate this story : and read/post review(s)


Article reviews



Post your review
[ Note : no HTML/URLs - will removed automatically ]
Your name
Your comments


More articles from Legal

Add article | Manage Articles | Top Rated articles | Most Reviewed articles | Contact us | Links