Articles database
 
 
Web AnyArticles.com
Browse by Category:
 
  Subcategories


  Categories :
 
  Arts and Entertainment
  Automotive
  Business
  Communications
  Computers and Technology
  Finance
  Food and Drink
  Health and Fitness
  Home and Family
  Home Based Business
  Internet and Businesses Online
  Kids and Teens
  Legal
  News and Society
  Recreation and Sports
  Reference and Education
  Self Improvement
  Shopping and Product Reviews
  Travel and Leisure
  Womens Interests
  Writing and Speaking
  Random Category
  Grief Loss
  Funny stuff
  Web Development
Legal article : Microsoft V. Google – Kai-Fu Lees Non-Compete Agreement
 

Legal > Microsoft V. Google – Kai-Fu Lees Non-Compete Agreement

0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Richard Chapo

Unless you’ve been on vacation all summer, the brawl between Google and Microsoft should be old news. New developments, however, have occurred with publication of the non-compete agreement signed by Kai-Fu Lee.

Google v. Microsoft

Earlier this year, Kai-Fu Lee quit Microsoft to go work for Google. In doing so, Lee allegedly violated a non-compete agreement he had signed with Microsoft. Predictably, Microsoft sued Lee to prevent the move and the brawl began. Microsoft landed the first punch by getting a temporary restraining order preventing Lee from working for Google until the case is resolved.

Non-Compete Language

As matters have moved forward, the language in the non-compete agreement has become public knowledge. Generally, Lee agreed not to work for a major competitor of Microsoft if he left the company for a period of one year. The specifics of the language, however, are grossly entertaining

In signing the non-compete agreement, Lee agreed:

1. “…not to accept employment or engage in activities competitive with products, services or projects…of Microsoft…I worked on or …learned confidential

or proprietary information or trade secrets while employed.”

2. All litigation arising from the non-compete agreement would occur in the State of Washington.

Mr. Lee and Google have a serious problem. California courts rarely enforce non-compete agreements, while Washington courts do. Since Microsoft sued first and Lee specifically agreed to Washington jurisdiction, this case should remain in Washington. Google is trying to move jurisdiction to California, but Microsoft beat it to the punch. Google’s attorneys simply blew it.

Prediction

Predictions in legal disputes are iffy at best, but Mr. Lee and Google have really fallen on their face in this one. Why they didn’t sue Microsoft in California court before Microsoft could react is mind boggling. The deck is now stacked heavily in favor of Microsoft and you can expect an outright victory for Microsoft or a settlement on terms set by the company.

Richard A. Chapo is a San Diego business lawyer with http://www.sandiegobusinesslawfirm.com - providing legal services and legal advice to businesses in San Diego, California.



0 Reviews [ add review ], Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Richard Chapo
Rate this story : and read/post review(s)


Article reviews



Post your review
[ Note : no HTML/URLs - will removed automatically ]
Your name
Your comments


More articles from Legal

Add article | Manage Articles | Top Rated articles | Most Reviewed articles | Contact us | Links