| |
Self Improvement > Health and Longevity: Changing My Mind the Subliminal Way
0
Reviews [ add review ],
Article rating : 0.00, 0 votes. Author : Eldon Taylor
Attitudes and beliefs have long been suspected of
impacting life in meaningful ways. However, only in the past
decade or so has so-called hard science turned to this
page. Today there is little argument about the influence of
attitude and belief on health, wellness, longevity, and the
general quality of life that a positive expectation can exert.
That's the good news--the bad news is simply that most
people carry around self defeating beliefs about everything
from aging to the common cold.
For years I have worked with elite athletes. There is no
necessity to explain the power of the mind to an athlete.
They get it right away. They get it because they experience it
in their game. They know that doubt, fear, anxiousness,
nervousness, lack of confidence, etc., fail to produce the
desired outcome, and therefore--lose those attitudes,
feelings and beliefs or lose!
Athletes are not the only people to intuitively understand the
value of changing our minds to change our lives. Business
people are also particularly adroit in this area. The mental
edge is just that, an edge, an advantage, an opportunity.
Lose it and lose!
Life and all its glory is not about winning and losing. It is
really about the quality of our experiences. As we expand our
horizons, the world meets us with a cornucopia of
opportunity. As we grow individually in the appreciation for
life's many miracles, all of us improve. Our ability to take
responsibility for the things we can change and let go of the
things we can't change opens entirely new possibilities for
personal well being, and planetary peace, balance and
harmony. As each of us releases the compulsion to blame
and replaces it with the desire to understand, trust and
allow, our quality of life improves. Now, that's not just so
much philosophy, it's a matter that can be and has been
demonstrated neuro-chemically. All this "cosmic fluff," as
critics in the past may have labeled it, is indeed the real stuff
that matters.
Now that the role of mind is so well documented in every
aspect of our lives, how do we change those old self
defeating patterns, those old engrained beliefs, those old
urges to get even, those old tendencies to dwell on negative
experiences, and so forth. There are lots of ways to begin to
take control of your own thoughts. Some of them include
hypnosis, autogenic training, NLP, a trip to the Himalayas to
study in a cave for years, and so forth. There is nothing
wrong with any of these methods. They do, however, all put
a definite demand on our time. In today's fast paced world,
one of our problems is the lack of time.
Coming of Age
The idea behind subliminal communication as a modality
for changing the mind captured the imagination of many, in
part, because of its ease. No extra time investment required.
Change your mind the easy way. Play it while you sleep,
while driving, while working on your computer, while
watching TV, and so forth. In fact, the idea was so exciting
that many rushed in to cash in on self-help made easy.
Our culture is served by capitalistic motives and that's just
how it is. There isn't anything wrong with cashing in, so to
speak, on a new drug, a new technology, a new
anything--so long as it really works. The problem was
simple, too much profit motive and too little good work. Let's
take a look at what one could call the subliminal legend.
James Vicary brought subliminal stimuli out of the closets
and laboratories of academics with his use of it to sell
popcorn and Coca-Cola. Well, he said he increased
concession sales dramatically by flashing hungry and thirsty
messages over Kim Novak's face during the showing of the
movie Picnic. However, Vicary later told Congress that he
made the whole thing up. Did he--didn't he--who knows?
The point is not whether he did or not, but that his boast
brought significant public attention to this potential
persuasion technique.
Suddenly the market place swelled with subliminal this and
that. Books, articles, ads and self-help tapes proliferated
everywhere. By 1984, the Orwellian year, subliminal tapes
were in nearly every bookstore in America. Surveys
suggested that most people did not believe a subliminal
tape could help them but they did believe subliminal
information could be used covertly to brainwash them.
There was a definite cognitive dissonance in the minds of
many--the technology was futile in the arena of help but
super powerful in the hands of manipulators. (For more
information see my book, Subliminal Communication:
Emperor's Clothes or Panacea). Despite this general belief,
subliminal self-help tapes sold record numbers until the
late 1980's.
Academics during the eighties spoke out against subliminal
tapes in nearly every major story on the subject. They
claimed there was no evidence for effectiveness and even if
the subconscious mind could process the stimuli, there
was no evidence, and or even basis, to believe that
subliminal messages could influence behavior. By 1990,
the scientific trend was changing, but a now infamous trial
in Reno, Nevada, would submit a near death blow to the
subliminal promise. In what the Judge termed,
"manipulation of the media," the defendants in this case did
all they could do to turn subliminal motivation into a theory
advanced by quacks and frauds. The public saw and heard
very little of what really went on in this trial. Instead, they
were virtually inundated in almost every imaginable form of
media with jokes, innuendoes and outright insults upon
anyone silly enough to think subliminal information could
persuade one to think in a certain way, let alone act upon it.
(For details see my book, Thinking Without Thinking and or
click below for an excerpt detailing the Judas Priest case).
(http://www.progressiveawareness.org/articles/Thinking_Wit
hout_Thinking.html #BRAINWASHING)
The Cargo Cult Revisited
In a scathing article attacking subliminal communication
among other things, the term "Cargo Cult" was used to
describe a practice that mixed a little science in a cauldron
of nonsense full of myth and folklore, and offered the mixture
up as scientific. Now that loosely paraphrases the idea, but
it also makes the point quite clear. The lay public and many
scientists were made to believe that subliminal stimuli was
itself only cargo cult nonsense. To prove this point, some of
the pundits most vociferously opposed to subliminal
motivation carried out studies with commercial subliminal
audio tapes. (That is not to say that all such studies were
motivated in this way and/or conducted by scientists
determined to prove a foregone conclusion--for that simply
would not be true). Several such studies repeatedly
demonstrated no effect. Many were unable to recover even
the slightest tracing of an actual verbal message from the
commercial subliminal audio tape. A broad brush painted
the entire field as a result. Some commercial companies
that sold subliminal tapes closed their doors and went out
of business while others dropped their subliminal products
and went on with something else. This was as it should be
and may still apply in many instances. After all, in many
ways, the industry deserved the scathing. (I am not attacking
or defending the audio tape subliminal industry per se'. I
should also be clear that the technology I developed, known
and patented as Whole Brain¨ InnerTalk¨, is technically a
dichotic shadowing approach that is only modestly masked.
It has been called the "unsubliminal subliminal." Still, for
most people, since they do not understand, if in fact they
hear the affirmations, InnerTalk¨ is considered to be
subliminal).
Recently a customer from Europe phoned my offices. Our
customer service person came into my office following the
call. They were told that a company, I'll let the company be
anonymous, had informed this customer whose native
tongue was not English, that the language used on a tape
program did not need to be in any language other than
English. This they insisted on despite the fact that the
people who would be listening to the program did not
understand English. Now either this suggests something
like English is the master language of the unconscious
and/or something like the intent of the words is understood
by the unconscious and therefore an English only speaking
person could listen to Chinese and benefit from the
program. I consider these kind of statements to not only be
theoretically and factually flawed but dishonest. It is
precisely this kind of marketing that brought about much of
the contempt many scientists held for the subliminal
self-help field. Unfortunately, some of this still goes on.
Nevertheless, by 1998 much of the real scientific debate
had ended.
In the marvelous book published by the American
Psychological Association, Empirical Perspectives on the
Psychoanalytic Unconscious, edited by Robert Bornstein
and Joseph Masling, the Editors write," Early in the twentieth
century, research focused on establishing the existence of
unconscious mental processes and on demonstrating that
these processes could produce measurable effects on
motivation, emotion, cognition and behavior Controversies
surrounded the measurement of unconscious mental
processes (By 1992) these investigations demonstrated
unequivocally that not only do stimuli perceived or
remembered without awareness influence behavior, but
they also produce effects on responding that are
qualitatively different than those produced by stimuli
consciously perceived and rememberedŃ"
The Editors continue, "Consider the following: During the
1980s, there were dozens of published papers questioning
the existence of unconscious perception and memory.
Since 1990, there has not been a single article in a
mainstream psychology journal challenging the existence of
these phenomena." [1998, p.xvi-xix].
Not everyone attempts to keep pace with developments in
the sciences. Only a couple of months ago a new
hypnotherapy publication arrived in my office with a story
debunking subliminal communication. The story quoted
Howard Shevrin's comment, much quoted in the past, which
asserted no behavioral influence could be produced with
subliminal stimuli. Dr. Shevrin made that statement in the
early 80s. He refuted that statement completely when he
testified that it was his opinion that the subliminal message
in the Stained Class album by Judas Priest, was a causal
factor in the double shooting in question during the Reno
Trial. (Taylor, 1995).
The Pendulum Swings Again
The popular press during the nineties portrayed and/or
reported, often in a liquor advertisement, that a subliminal
stimulus was simply a hoax. The popular press did not
cover many stories that showed effectiveness with
subliminal treatment protocols. Even when they did, as with
our own, End Child Violence program, a sort of tongue in
cheek caveat was added at the end of the story which
essentially suggested with suspicion that subliminal stimuli
was dubious and unproven.
Compounding all of this for many people was the position
taken by some religious organizations that asserted evil
influences were attached to subliminal learning techniques.
I personally saw a very rewarding program go down the
drain over this mindset. We participated in a study with a
school district whereby we provided the tapes and
auto-reverse cassette players. Juveniles who were failing
were exposed to learning tapes using subliminal motivation
affirmations, our patented InnerTalk technology. The study
results impressed everyone. However, when an effort to
extend the pilot project to the entire district for at risk children
was made, the religious objections prevailed.
When the time has come for something--it has come. My
Father used to laugh and scoff at me when I spoke of things
like men travelling to the moon. I still remember the
amazement of many of my elders when President John F.
Kennedy pledged to put a man on the moon. Perhaps there
will still be those people who firmly oppose subliminal
communication ten years from now, but if there are, it will
probably be for reasons other than science. The science is
in. The subconscious learns, solves problems, plans and
hides many things from the conscious. It is not a repository
of indelible memories written like on some blank slate, but it
is dynamic and activates much of what we call behavior. It is
not magical, translating Chinese, but often the conscious
can only guess at what truly lies within its motives.
Suddenly, once again, the study of consciousness is fair
game in the discipline of psychology. What is even more
exciting, is that once again studies reporting the benefits of
subliminal stimuli are back in the popular press. Take for
instance the recent report that subliminal messages
facilitated more youthful feelings.
"Positive Thinking Makes Seniors Stronger Walkers," was
the title of a story reported by Reuters. The study was
reported on in the Journal of the American Geriatrics
Society, but it gained prominence in the popular media
including the Internet. Not a derisive word appeared as the
story reported, "In a controlled study of how older people
walk, gerontologists found that a single, quick, subliminal
exposure to positive terms about aging--words such as
'wise' and 'experienced'--significantly improved the subjects
speed and coordination."
(http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9911/02/elderly.fitness/index.
html)
There are hundreds of studies that could have been
reported on like this one. If you're interested in more
information, take a look at this link for a review (citation and
brief description) of the subliminal research literature:
(http://www.progressiveawareness.org/research_deskrefer
ence.html)
There will still be controversies--that we can all count on.
There are still many more unanswered questions, than
there are answers. There is still an abundance of
non-sense out there, ranging from commercial companies
that claim millions of messages on a thirty minute tape to
nonsense about secret messages. There is a difference in
subliminal techniques, whether in the laboratory or in the
market place. There is a distinct difference between visual
and audio subliminal delivery systems. There is much to
say about the nature of the affirmations employed as
subliminal stimuli. In my various books, I have covered most
of this in depth and it is not the focus of this article, so let it
just be said, not all so-called subliminals work! (For more
info hit this link:
(http://www.innertalk.com/downloads/subtech.html). Still, the
pendulum has swung and subliminal information
processing has come of age.
Changing the mind by accessing unconscious processes
via subliminal stimuli is a truly viable alternative today. Our
patented InnerTalk technology has been repeatedly
demonstrated effective in many diverse domains. It's an
exciting time and we continue to work hard to bring you the
very best product available. We were fortunate; we missed
most of the criticism leveled at others. Indeed, some of
those pundits insisted that our products were not truly
subliminal, since words are often heard when using our
tapes, albeit, typically those words are not understood. We
designed a technology that would bypass conscious
interference and go directly to the unconscious. It does that
and we're very pleased with its proven result. Still,
remember that there's no magic here. At best, our products
are antidotes for negative beliefs and self-limiting patterns.
You're the miracle--you're the magic. You do the doing, and
we're proud to in some small way, facilitate your journey.
Thank you.
Eldon Taylor, Ph.D. is the director of Progressive Awareness
Research. He is a diplomat in the American Psychotherapy
Association and a certified hypnotherapist. He recieved the
International Peace Prize awarded by the United Cultural
Convention in 2005. He is the author of over 200 books and
tapes (http://www.innertalk.com). His bio can be found in more
than two dozen Who's Who publications including Who's
Who of Intellectuals. His research into human potential
spans more than a quarter of a century.
Article reviews
Post your review
[ Note : no HTML/URLs - will removed automatically ]
More articles from Self Improvement
|